It is analytical, and oriented towards radical change in its mood. The Introduction is a refreshing historiographical essay. However, the specialist will find more in the Introduction (and in fact, in the whole Dictionary). It is well written and has the unique distinction that specialist and non-specialist will find it easy to read and understand. This Introduction is a concise summary of Swazi history. The Introduction sets out the historical context of the Dictionary. Thus, Booth's Dictionary is a useful tool for teaching and research on Swaziland.Īfter the preliminary matter, the book is divided into two sections, namely, Introduction (pp. This bibliography has an enduring merit as a beginning point for research on Swaziland which effectively compliments the masterly work of Balam Nyeko. 347-397) divided into ten easy to follow sections. The glossary shows that the Swazi have a rich culture and history. The orthography on Siswati and glossary of certain key words make it even more compelling to read. It clearly leaves no doubt about the stature of the scholar and the quality of the book. The preliminary matter also has a rich chronology of Swazi history. The anticipation is fully satisfied because Booth delivers what is promised. Both Woronoff and Booth leave the reader with a feeling of anticipation that it is worthwhile to go through the whole book. Alan Booth follows with an erudite expression of debt to other scholars who influenced his labour in preparing the Dictionary.
#SOCIAL BOOTH REFRESHING SERIES#
The Dictionary opens with a brief note and preview of the book and an evaluation of the author by the series editor, Jon Woronoff. The interpretation of Swazi history, contemporary developments and projections on the future of the country are refreshing and well grounded.Īs a guide, the preliminary matter in the book is clearly set out. Booth's Dictionary is of similar academic status as an outstanding piece of scholarship that will be invaluable to any researcher on Swaziland for a long time. Jones, Biographical Register of Swaziland to 1902, as "indispensable" and Balam Nyeko's bibliography on Swaziland as "incomparable". Booth also defers to other scholars describing the work of Huw M. He presents the book with much understanding of, and sensitivity to, Swazi traditions as a historical force and as such his analysis and criticism are situated in a convincing scholarly context. In this Dictionary, Booth shows his profound knowledge of history in Swaziland and how that history has continued to shape contemporary Swaziland. This is well demonstrated in the high quality of organisation, presentation and historical explanation found in the Historical Dictionary of Swaziland. Booth is undoubtedly among the leading historians of Swaziland. Kanduza (Department of History, University of Swaziland)Īlan R.